So you justify distancing from whole groups based on how strongly attached one is to the idea of the “invisible man in the sky”?

Let me makes this clear, just because one values science does not make them right.

More information (xy+science) just leads to being statistically a little less wrong over the sum of ones decision.

Each has their capabilities and is at a certain point in their development.

Would you tell a kid that it’s stupid when it’s afraid of a dog?

No, it’s perfectly reasonable. How the hell is it supposed to know that a wagging tail means it only wants to play?

To make it more personal again:

Maybe extend your thoughts to the concept of that unconditional love.

Try “science” to (dis)prove the effects of (dis)engaging through it, then read your comment again.